Eva Vedder vs Aneta Kucmova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 28 Aug at 12:00 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Vedder vs A. Kucmova

NED
1
Win
Played
1
Win

CZE
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-To-Head: Vedder 1 - 1 Kucmova
They have played 4 sets in total, with Eva Vedder winning 2 and Aneta Kucmova winning 2. The last match between Eva Vedder and Aneta Kucmova was at the W50 Bytom, 28-08-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Eva Vedder getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Vedder | 1 |
Kucmova | 1 |
Last H2H Matches:
(R2) W50 Bytom(08-28-25)
(R2) W75 Prerov(08-22-24)
E. Vedder vs A. Kucmova H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$12,205 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
58.12% (254-183) | Career Total W/L | 58.59% (208-147) |
1 | Clay | 1 |
3 | Titles | 4 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
33.33% (1-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
E. Vedder vs A. Kucmova Match Preview
- In recent months, Vedder has shown a stronger performance on their second serve, winning 42.32% of points compared to Kucmova's 37.33%.
- However, Kucmova demonstrates a clear advantage when it comes to returning second serves, with a success rate of 55.91% against Vedder's 45.86%.
- Considering first serve return effectiveness, Kucmova again leads with 37.13% compared to Vedder's 29.36% success rate.
- Regarding handling pressure, Vedder has proven to be more resilient, saving 50.27% of breakpoints compared to Kucmova's 41.23%.
- Over the past year, Vedder slightly edges out Kucmova in overall match win percentage, achieving 60.81% against Kucmova's 58.62%.
- In terms of surface preference, Kucmova excels on clay with a 63% win record, while Vedder's best performances are on hard courts, boasting a 60% win rate.
- In direct head-to-head encounters, Kucmova holds the upper hand, having won their only previous meeting in straight sets.
- Considering opponent quality, Vedder has faced stronger opponents on average, with an opponent ranking of 315.82, compared to Kucmova's 370.22.
- If a match extends to a deciding set, Kucmova has the superior record, clinching victory 65% of the time, while Vedder manages a 50% win rate in such scenarios.
- Kucmova's recent form shows better breakpoint conversion, capitalizing on 44.44% of opportunities, compared to Vedder's 39.04%.
Editorial Prediction (August 28, 2025, UTC):
As Kucmova and Vedder prepare to clash again, several factors come into play, suggesting subtle edges for both players. Vedder's superior second serve performance may give them an opportunity to gain early points and sway the momentum in their favor. However, Kucmova's ability to effectively return serves, especially second serves, grants her a distinct advantage in countering Vedder's initial superiority.
Kucmova's knack for breaking serve and converting breakpoint opportunities also comes across as a decisive factor, meaning Vedder will have to maximize their breakpoint save percentage to offset this challenge. Furthermore, Kucmova's dominant on-clay record could potentially be pivotal if playing conditions lean towards her preferred surface.
Despite the tougher opposition Vedder has faced recently, Kucmova's past head-to-head success and her proficiency in clinching deciding sets if the match drags on provide her a slight edge. Ultimately, based on these factors and her ability to exploit them, Kucmova stands as the favorite to win this upcoming tennis match.
Eva Vedder vs Aneta Kucmova Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Vedder vs A. Kucmova H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
2 | Sets Won | 2 |
19 | Games Won | 15 |
5 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
10 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
1:38:29 | Avg. Match Time | 1:38:29 |
55% (66/121) | 1st Serve % | 65% (73/113) |
65% (43/66) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (44/73) |
55% (30/55) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (19/40) |
46% (6/13) | Break Pts Won % | 31% (4/13) |
44% (50/113) | Return Pts Won % | 40% (48/121) |
50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won → Match Won | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won → Match Lost | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost → Match Won | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Vedder Recent Matches Played
A. Kucmova Recent Matches Played

E. Vedder vs A. Kucmova Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
58.12% (254/183) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.59% (208/147) |
57.49% (576/426) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.18% (466/335) |
53.38% (4921/4298) | Games Win/Loss | 54.30% (3917/3297) |
59.74% (92/62) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (1/1) |
57.47% (150/111) | Clay Win/Loss | 62.32% (172/104) |
55.56% (10/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45.45% (35/42) |
50.00% (2/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
1072 | Aces Total | 439 |
0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
1081 | Total Double Faults | 996 |
1:32:19 | Average Match Time | 1:15:36 |
445.78 | Average Opponent Rank | 467.27 |
58% (15079/25890) | 1st Serve % | 61% (11624/19037) |
64% (9638/15046) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (7136/11624) |
49% (5280/10866) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (3394/7413) |
48% (1539/3193) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1284/2610) |
45% (12031/26448) | Return Points Win % | 48% (9236/19245) |
0.00% (0/2) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
40.00% (2/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
57.14% (8/6) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
56.27% (148/115) | Challenger W/L | 56.49% (135/104) |
62.75% (96/57) | Futures W/L | 63.48% (73/42) |
58% (250/431) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (207/349) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
48% (45/93) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (26/47) |
46% (61/133) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (44/93) |
83% (270/225) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (206/184) |
16% (270/43) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (206/22) |
17% (167/28) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (149/24) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
